Just FYI, that is at the point where we roll our eyes, explain that we don't restrict anything that's not illegal (and oh by the way with the exception of $things_we_have_already_stated, we need a court order to determine that something is 'illegal'), invite people to use our very nice killfile function (that doesn't exist yet, but will!), and have we mentioned that we hold a very generous liability-insurance policy, a war chest of legal defense money, and in-house counsel with a specialty in internet and first amendment law.
We're really, really serious when we say the absolute bare minimum restrictions we feel we have to place in order to cover our asses. There'll be a few things that are just 'basic human decency' type issues, like 'thou shalt not out other people, thou shalt not post someone's phone #, thou shalt not post someone's social security number', etc, that are less "legally necessary" and more "invasion of privacy" type issues, but other than that, we're really, really willing to accept a level of risk that companies backed by venture capital just flat out won't.
"Don't like it, don't read it" is both Mark's and my attitudes to a lot of things.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2009-03-28 09:31 am (UTC)We're really, really serious when we say the absolute bare minimum restrictions we feel we have to place in order to cover our asses. There'll be a few things that are just 'basic human decency' type issues, like 'thou shalt not out other people, thou shalt not post someone's phone #, thou shalt not post someone's social security number', etc, that are less "legally necessary" and more "invasion of privacy" type issues, but other than that, we're really, really willing to accept a level of risk that companies backed by venture capital just flat out won't.
"Don't like it, don't read it" is both Mark's and my attitudes to a lot of things.